The High Court has issued interim orders restraining Kikuyu musician Samuel Muchoki, popularly known as Samidoh, from contacting or interfering with a woman who has sued him over rape allegations.
In his ruling, Justice Lawrence Mugambi directed that pending the hearing and determination of the instant application, the interim issued is a non-contact and non-interference order which hereby restrains the Interested Party, whether by himself, his servants, agents or assigns, from contacting, intimidating, harassing or otherwise interferin
Protection of the Complainant
The woman, identified in court papers only by the initials M.R.W., will be shielded from any form of harassment or intimidation as the case proceeds. The judge further ordered that all pleadings and documents in the case be sealed to protect her identity and that Court proceedings may be held in camera where necessary.
Allegations Against the Musician
In her petition, M.R.W accuses Samidoh of sexual assault and has asked the court to compel investigations and ensure preservation of evidence related to her complaint. The woman claims she has preserved digital evidence of the alleged assault and subsequent interactions with the musician, including audio recordings and electronic messages in which Samidoh allegedly insulted and threatened her
In one exchange, she claims he dismissed her attempt to confront him about the assault by calling her a “professional prostitute.” She further alleges that between 2021 and 2023, Samidoh engaged in manipulative and coercive communication with her, alternating between friendliness and intimidation.
Court Directives
Justice Mugambi ordered:
- Police to forensically secure and preserve all documentary, digital, and electronic evidence, including audio and messaging records.
- Immediate issuance of written preservation notices to the relevant custodians.
- The petition and application to be served personally or via a newspaper with nationwide circulation within seven days.
- Responses to be filed within seven days of service, with rejoinders allowed in the same timeframe.
Petition Seeks State Action
Through her lawyers, Kaaya Memba & Company Advocates, M.R.W. is seeking urgent orders directing the police to register and investigate her case and the preservation of her digital evidence. She also wants the Attorney General to initiate mutual legal assistance with United States authorities to obtain certified police and prosecutorial records and the Witness Protection Agency to assess her risk and offer protection due to fears of harassment and intimidation.
Rights Cited in the Petition
M.R.W argues that the state’s inaction violates her constitutional rights, including:
- Dignity
- Equality
- Freedom and security of the person
- Fair administrative action
- Access to justice
Conclusion
The case will proceed as the court monitors compliance with its orders and awaits responses from the parties involved.
